Land and Housing Activist Collective objects to the private  auction of City-owned Land in Cape Town: 10/02/2022

Date: February 10, 2022
Download Land and Housing Activist Collective objects to the private  auction of City-owned Land in Cape Town: 10/02/2022

Full Statement:

Land and Housing Activist Collective objects to the private  auction of City-owned Land in Cape Town

This morning the City of Cape Town intends to proceed with the sale by auction of at  least 14 City-owned properties. The sale of public land in a housing crisis clearly  demonstrates a lack of determination to address the housing backlog and reverse the  apartheid legacy of spatial injustice. As the landless communities who populate the  housing list together with our parents and children, we see this injustice as a bold  statement that this city does not care about the poor. The conditions of over crowdedness, squalor, and lack of basic services under which we have lived for  generations compel us to object to the planned auction, despite welcoming the Mayor’s  decision to withdraw 3 sites from the proceedings. Housing the poor and integrating the  city needs to be the priority in all the city’s land use and disposal plans.

Municipal land disposals are regulated by the Municipal Finance Management Act  (MFMA) and the Municipal Asset Transfer Regulations MATR). All state land use  decisions are also subject to the principles of the Spatial Planning and Land Use  Management Act (SPLUMA) as well as the Constitution, specifically s26 and s25(5)  which affirm the rights to access adequate housing and to equitably access land.

The laws of the country are very clear about the duty to manage land in a manner that  responds to social problems, both current and historical. According to the MFMA, in  order to dispose of a piece of land the City needs to be sure 1) that the land is not  needed for basic municipal service provision and 2) that the amount of money they can  get by selling the land outweighs the social and community value that could be derived  by using it. Basic municipal services must be understood in the context of a particular  City and it always includes uplifting and empowering the poor who reside in a  municipality.

When challenged, the City said all properties up for auction have been “thoroughly  assessed” and are not required for municipal purposes. Yet in Cape Town, we have  nearly 400 thousand people waiting on the housing database and we have seen no  reversal of spatial apartheid in the 28 years of democracy. In this context, facilitating  access to well-located land is among the most important interventions the municipality  can make to improve the life of its poorest residents.

This auction suggests that the City continues to view land through a racist, apartheid  lens, where only the outskirts are deemed suitable for low-income housing. Black and  coloured neighbourhoods grow increasingly overcrowded as those facing eviction due to  the ridiculous cost of rental in Cape Town are moved there. We are forced to clash with  Law Enforcement over scraps of land on which we’ve built ourselves shelter and tried to  find community. The City would see us removed to “temporary” relocation areas where  we will wait and wait forever. Why is a plot in Newlands beyond the reach of those who  need it most? Why does the City continue to sell or lease truly well-located land every  day? It seems “infill” only means trouble for us, rather than densifying the  neighbourhoods that have the best services. It seems open space in the suburbs is

sacred while in the township it is an opportunity to squeeze even more human beings  into a poverty trap.

One clear comparison is between Bonteheuwel and Claremont. Last year, Bonteheuwel  residents submitted hundreds of objections to the City’s plan to develop housing on one  of the only sports fields our schools and community clubs could use. It was a beloved  space, activated every single weekend by families in the area. Our objections fell on  deaf ears. Last week, the Primrose Sports Club wrote one open letter regarding the  auction of land adjacent to the space they lease. They got a direct, personal phone call  and a meeting from the Mayor himself. That land has been withdrawn from auction, but  is it for the right reasons?

We must emphasise that we welcome the withdrawal of the three sites from this auction.  As positive a gesture as this is, we challenge the City of Cape Town to be more  imaginative. The opportunities available on these pieces of land may seem small in  comparison to the scale of the need, but with clever design and access they could have  a big impact. Among the key reasons this does not happen is lack of proper meaningful  consultation and engagement with the communities in need. The law obliges municipal  leadership to consult and co-determine the future of the city with its communities. We  demand full transparency from the City on how the decision to dispose of these sites by  auction was made, by whom, and according to what criteria. This practice of governing  the city for us and not with us is what we demand should come to an end.

Cape Town needs a truly unified strategy for how we share space. We need to know  what land is available and to be part of planning how it is put to good use. The City is a  custodian of public land. This land has social, community, spiritual and other value  beyond its financial price tag – and this land is ours. It carries the history of our  dispossession, our struggle, and our dreams. It cannot be treated like any ordinary  asset, to be traded for petty cash. We reject public participation processes that ask us to  rubber stamp disposal decisions that have already been made. We are the people, not  stakeholders and clients. It is not our job to convince you against a decision. It is your  job to listen to what we decide. 


● Stephen Maciko, Housing Assembly, 062 151 9501

● Bevil Lucas, Reclaim the City, 083 718 1577

Housing Assembly

Reclaim The City


Intlungu Yase Matyhotyhombeni